Google’s attempt to revamp targeted advertising in its Chrome browser appears to be getting more attention than praise. Even Britain’s privacy regulator, the Information Commissioner’s Office, is skeptical that Google’s third-party cookie alternatives will only cause more problems.
These concerns were passed on to the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). But why is the group’s opinion so important? Let’s unravel why this is important in the whole story of saying goodbye to third-party cookies.
First of all, what the heck is CMA?
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is essentially the watchdog of the UK business community. We monitor mergers, make sure companies are acting fairly, and investigate when we smell something fishy in the market. Its mission is to keep competition healthy and protect consumers from shady practices.
So why should we care what UK regulators think about the fate of these cookie alternatives??
The CMA has the power to adjust the schedule for phasing out third-party cookies to prevent Google from gaining an unfair advantage through alternative privacy sandboxing. The company is asking ad tech companies and publishers to begin testing the privacy sandbox in earnest by June.
Wait a minute, what is a privacy sandbox?
In a nutshell, this is Google’s attempt to overhaul how targeted ads work in its Chrome browser, keeping privacy in mind. For now I’m tinkering with some parts and testing others. Whatever form this sandbox ultimately takes, it will not completely replace third-party cookies. Because, honestly, if you did, you’d totally miss the point of throwing them aside along with all the trouble they caused. Needless to say, sandboxes are complicated. If you want to know more, keep reading about it here.
Understood. Back to CMA and Google..
If Google fails to convince the CMA, the regulator could put the brakes on Google’s plans to phase out third-party cookies by the end of the year. And there are some legitimate concerns. Regulators are concerned that Google will use Chrome data to recreate cookie tracking that no one can copy, taking advantage of the fact that it gives the tech giant’s advertising platform an unfair advantage. Additionally, I’m not convinced that Google gives users enough control over their privacy settings.
Speaking of privacy…
The CMA isn’t monitoring Google’s moves just for advertising competition. No, we’re also focused on how these changes will affect people’s privacy. Both of these elements are like peanut butter and jelly and cannot be completely separated. Think of it this way. If Google is pushing forward with privacy-preserving technology that reduces the data available for advertising, it’s bound to shake things up in terms of revenue, at least in the short term, especially for publishers. This is a delicate balance between privacy and profit, and the CMA is monitoring how everything unfolds.
So what is the CMA’s stance on sandboxes now?
Well, it also became clear that, although there are some concerns, the group wants to resolve the issue, as outlined in the January report. After all, Google has a legal obligation to address these concerns. However, if the issue cannot be resolved, the CMA will not hesitate to use its powers to delay the termination of third-party cookies in Chrome. Now it’s a bit of a waiting game. Will Google make enough changes to satisfy the CMA, or will it find itself in an endless regulatory standoff? Only time will tell.
how did we get here?
Back in 2021, the CMA decided to thoroughly investigate whether alternatives to third-party cookies in Google’s Chrome browser were working fairly. Since then, the tech giant has agreed to keep a number of promises while developing the sandbox to ensure everything goes as planned.
These commitments include a moratorium (originally set at 60 days, which may be extended to 120 days) during which the CMA assesses the progress of the Privacy Sandbox and potential changes to the industry. ) was also included. Google has promised that he will address all concerns raised by the CMA during this period before proceeding with the deprecation of cookies.
What happens if Google removes third-party cookies from Chrome — will the CMA walk away??
No, regulators will be constantly moving and monitoring how the sandbox unfolds. This means that Google will monitor every twist and turn as it implements the changes. We’ll have to wait for the next quarterly report to find out what happens next.
https://digiday.com/?p=541832
