Close Menu
  • Home
  • Business News
    • Entrepreneurship
  • Investments
  • Markets
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Startups
    • Stock Market
  • Trending
    • Technology
  • Online Jobs

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

What's Hot

Tech Entrepreneurship: Eliminating waste and eliminating scarcity

July 17, 2024

AI for Entrepreneurs and Small Business Owners

July 17, 2024

Young Entrepreneurs Succeed in Timor-Leste Business Plan Competition

July 17, 2024
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • Business News
    • Entrepreneurship
  • Investments
  • Markets
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Startups
    • Stock Market
  • Trending
    • Technology
  • Online Jobs
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
Prosper planet pulse
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • About us
    • Advertise with Us
  • AFFILIATE DISCLOSURE
  • Contact
  • DMCA Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Terms of Use
  • Shop
Prosper planet pulse
Home»Opinion»OPINION | Why Bill Clinton and OJ Simpson implicated Donald Trump and Hunter Biden
Opinion

OPINION | Why Bill Clinton and OJ Simpson implicated Donald Trump and Hunter Biden

prosperplanetpulse.comBy prosperplanetpulse.comJune 27, 2024No Comments10 Mins Read0 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


David Friend, an editor at Vanity Fair magazine, is the author of The Naughty Nineties: The Decade That Unleashed Sex, Lies, and the World Wide Web.

In the past few months, the US has been rocked by two high-profile trials. In one, Donald Trump was found guilty of 34 felony counts related to a scheme to bribe porn actresses to keep quiet about sexual encounters during the 2016 election (Trump’s sentence is scheduled for July 11). In the other, President Biden’s son Hunter was found guilty of three felony counts for providing false information on an application to purchase a firearm. During the trial, jurors heard testimony from a woman Hunter Biden met at a strip club who said the defendant smoked crack cocaine (the sentence is expected to be handed down by October).

Strippers and porn stars haven’t figured much in the story of America’s First Family since the founding of the republic. Neither have hush money or cocaine addictions. But here we are, and I believe much of the current uproar dates back to exactly 30 years ago, when two other legal dramas were sweeping the nation. I firmly believe that two eerily simultaneous news events in May and June of 1994 unleashed a tsunami of sex, scandal, shamelessness and outright lies whose effects are still rippling throughout the culture.

On May 6, 1994, former Arkansas government official Paula Jones filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against President Bill Clinton. Jones claimed that three years earlier, when Clinton was governor, he had naked before her in a Little Rock hotel room, a charge he denied. The lawsuit pitted Jones and her far-right supporters against the president and his powerful legal and political team, with Clinton’s allies trading insinuations to discredit Jones and undermine her allegations. The showdown marked the beginning of a five-year saga of prosecutorial abuse, political fistfights, and immorality that culminated in the president’s impeachment by the House of Representatives and acquittal by the Senate in 1999.

On June 17, 1994, six weeks after Jones filed his lawsuit, former football star O.J. Simpson drove off in a white Ford Bronco, attempting to escape a police ring. The “slow-speed car chase” was broadcast live in front of an estimated 95 million viewers. After turning himself in to authorities, he was charged with the stabbing deaths of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ronald Goldman. For many, the ensuing legal battle, which ended with Simpson’s acquittal, became the first real-world reality TV show, a soap opera that dominated the nation for more than a year.

At the time, these two legal battles were so unusual that they were treated as cultural anomalies. Coverage of the Jones case, which seems hard to believe now, was initially deemed too salacious (a president accused of sex crimes?) to merit mainstream media coverage. It was largely dismissed as a nuisance lawsuit, relegated to talk radio, tabloids, and the murky corners of a new realm called the World Wide Web. But by 1998, two new news and opinion outlets, the Drudge Report (launched in 1995) and Fox News (launched the following year), had rapidly escalated the Jones case into front-page news, with a special counsel appointed to investigate Clinton’s potential misconduct (and soon sex).

When it was revealed that the president was having an affair with a White House intern, the news took on an explicitly sexual overtone. The Starr Report alone was 7,793 pages long and available for download on the Internet, and was so sexually explicit that journalist Renata Adler described it as “a vast work of deranged pornography.” This harrowing spectacle was summarized by Philip Roth in his novel: the stain of humanity“It was the summer when the president’s penis was on everyone’s mind, and a life of shameless impurity once again embarrassed America.”

By then, Simpson’s “trial of the century” had already begun to turn TV news into 24-hour entertainment. The courtroom drama, with its oddball ensemble of misfits, sharply suited lawyers, and publicity-hungry characters, seemed more like a circus than a murder trial. There were testimonies about rampant drug use, briefs chronicling sexual adventures, and defense lawyer kayfabes that sounded like something out of a pro-wrestling textbook. There was judge Lance Ito, houseguest Brian “Cato” Kaelin, and Brown Simpson’s Akita, also named Cato. Simpson’s ex-girlfriend Paula Barbieri, Brown Simpson’s friend Faye Resnick, and one juror made a cameo in Playboy. The nightly parade of TV “experts” (Greta Van Susteren, Geraldo Rivera, a Stetson-wearing Jerry Spence) became the cable TV equivalent of Weegee: a smorgasbord of voyeurism and bloodshed. And let’s not forget Simpson’s lawyer friend, Robert Kardashian, who became the patriarch of a clan that would become a swarm of reality TV stars.

In and out of the courtroom, the actors performed for the cameras. The resulting limited, binge-worthy series shattered notions of legal ethics in the American mind, and even reality itself. As author Jonathan Schell wrote, the Simpson-Clinton drama became a beta test for “a new media machine that chose to elevate what he called a trivial matter (sex and lies about sex) into a major event (the impeachment of a president and damage to the constitutional system).” [and] “It may have fatally tilted the balance of forces that was newly at stake — the balance between fantasy and reality,” Schell believes. He believes the Bronco chase in June 1994 was a turning point: “At that moment, virtual reality and old-fashioned reality became inseparably fused in some new way.”

At the time, the cases against Clinton and Simpson were unusual, eerie spectacles set in the midst of mundane public life. By 2000, both presidential candidates, George W. Bush and Al Gore, had campaigned on the idea of ​​restoring “normalcy” to a country ravaged by the loss of “values.” They failed miserably. But in the three decades since this story began, the bizarre has become commonplace. Themes that had been pushed to the fringes of culture have somehow come imperceptibly to the forefront. In 2024, we can barely make out the plot as a barrage of scandals, unimaginably bad choices, and social media memes come and go, each more outrageous than the last.

In September 2023, for example, a video surfaced of Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) sitting in the audience of a Denver theater during a performance of the musical “Beetlejuice” and appearing to grope the genital area of ​​her male companion. A month later, camera footage surfaced of two men engaging in sexual activity in a hearing room in Sen. Hart’s office building. These dumpster fires continue. Last month, presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (a habitual cheater, former heroin addict, and alleged proponent of conspiracy theories) claimed that a doctor he examined in 2010 found dead parasites in his brain. And in May, two lawmakers engaged in a schoolyard-style verbal exchange on the House floor. After Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) criticized Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) by saying, “I think your fake eyelashes are ruining what you’re reading,” Crockett fired back, criticizing Greene’s “bleach blonde, unkempt, masculine body.”

It doesn’t stop. Even outside the halls of Congress, pop culture is saturated with explicit sex, from Miranda July’s novel All Fours (whose tales of lust and fantasy are driving book clubs wild) to Netflix’s third season of Bridgerton (depicting a sexy Regency-era orgy). And it seems like every other month, a teacher or professor loses their job from academia because, in their off-hours, they happen to be posting DIY adult images and videos on their OnlyFans accounts. Shame on you. No, it’s not.

There are myriad reasons why this sleaze and poverty is so prevalent, but fundamentally there are three causes.

First, our chief executives have become increasingly adept at offering master classes in deception over time. This has been going on since well before the 90s, from Lyndon B. Johnson and Richard M. Nixon (who lied about Vietnam), to the consummate actor Ronald Reagan (who never mentioned AIDS during his first term), to Clinton (who was impeached for lying under oath), to George W. Bush (who lied about “mission accomplished” in Iraq and that FEMA Director Michael D. Brown had “done a great job” in responding to Hurricane Katrina). It was only a matter of time before this long era of lying produced a leader like Donald Trump, whose falsehoods so often exceed reality that they recall Mary McCarthy’s famous line to Lillian Hellman: “Every word she writes is a lie, even the ‘and’ and the’.” For large swaths of the population, outright lying in the short term (as a way to achieve long-term goals) had become a tactic, a way of behaving, a kind of accepted ethical quirk.

Second, since Jones and Simpson, we have lost our collective sense of shame. As Christopher Hitchens wrote in a 1996 Vanity Fair column, tabloid culture has somehow made America “a country in which it is almost impossible to shame.” Narcissists began to inflate their own value in society in entirely new ways. Haters began to be consumed by fear and loathing, often taking pleasure in degrading those they considered worse off, or more often than not, lucky. Shame became archaic, a vestige of a bygone era of civility and decency. To quote the wise Hitchens, “There is a good reason why the words ‘shameful’ and ‘shameless’ define the same behavior. You know you have behaved shamefully if you have subjected others to unnecessary inconvenience and embarrassment. If you don’t understand this, you won’t know you have behaved shamelessly.”

Finally, speaking of the Clinton-Simpson reality TV circus, there was reality TV itself. Since 1992, when MTV’s “The Real World” aired as the first modern reality TV show, the genre has fully infiltrated the bloodstream of people’s behavior. Since then, the mass audience called America has become a horde of innate exhibitionists. Their public and private behavior, and even their sex lives, have been unintentionally shaped by the tropes and rituals of such shows: rehearsed indignities, false seductions, and the belief that, as Shakespeare had already said, all life is a stage. And with the rise of social media in the early 2000s, the deal was solidified. In the 90s, there were only a few people, a few dozen at most, at the white-hot core of the madness. Now, billions of so-called users seek followers, the virtual merges with the real, and the loudest and most shiny car crashes get the most likes. Hesitation Before you can stare at the car crash and try to exercise the bare minimum of courtesy, the fools have rushed in en masse and the better angels have already fled.

Perhaps Stormy Daniels said it best, when explaining why she stayed in contact with the man who she claims urged her to watch a documentary about shark attacks after their affair: “I wanted to maintain that relationship because I wasn’t sure if I was going to be on The Apprentice yet. It would have been amazing.” Who could argue?



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
prosperplanetpulse.com
  • Website

Related Posts

Opinion

The rule of law is more important than feelings about Trump | Opinion

July 15, 2024
Opinion

OPINION | Biden needs to follow through on promise to help Tulsa victims

July 15, 2024
Opinion

Opinion | Why China is off-limits to me now

July 15, 2024
Opinion

Opinion | Fast food chains’ value menu wars benefit consumers

July 15, 2024
Opinion

Uncovering the truth about IVF myths | Opinion

July 15, 2024
Opinion

Opinion: America’s definition of “refugee” needs updating

July 15, 2024
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Subscribe to News

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

Editor's Picks

The rule of law is more important than feelings about Trump | Opinion

July 15, 2024

OPINION | Biden needs to follow through on promise to help Tulsa victims

July 15, 2024

Opinion | Why China is off-limits to me now

July 15, 2024

Opinion | Fast food chains’ value menu wars benefit consumers

July 15, 2024
Latest Posts

ATLANTIC-ACM Announces 2024 U.S. Business Connectivity Service Provider Excellence Awards

July 10, 2024

Costco’s hourly workers will get a pay raise. Read the CEO memo.

July 10, 2024

Why a Rockland restaurant closed after 48 years

July 10, 2024

Stay Connected

Twitter Linkedin-in Instagram Facebook-f Youtube

Subscribe