Close Menu
  • Home
  • Business News
    • Entrepreneurship
  • Investments
  • Markets
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Startups
    • Stock Market
  • Trending
    • Technology
  • Online Jobs

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

What's Hot

Tech Entrepreneurship: Eliminating waste and eliminating scarcity

July 17, 2024

AI for Entrepreneurs and Small Business Owners

July 17, 2024

Young Entrepreneurs Succeed in Timor-Leste Business Plan Competition

July 17, 2024
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • Business News
    • Entrepreneurship
  • Investments
  • Markets
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Startups
    • Stock Market
  • Trending
    • Technology
  • Online Jobs
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
Prosper planet pulse
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • About us
    • Advertise with Us
  • AFFILIATE DISCLOSURE
  • Contact
  • DMCA Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Terms of Use
  • Shop
Prosper planet pulse
Home»Opinion»Opinion | Supreme Court should allow states and cities to clear homeless camps
Opinion

Opinion | Supreme Court should allow states and cities to clear homeless camps

prosperplanetpulse.comBy prosperplanetpulse.comApril 19, 2024No Comments4 Mins Read0 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Of the 653,000 people experiencing homelessness in the United States, 41% live in the nine westernmost states, according to the latest federal survey. This includes the five states with the highest percentages of unsheltered people. The reasons range from poverty and drug addiction patterns to California’s mild climate. Of the 181,000 homeless people, 68% are unsheltered, more than any other state. But a lesser-known but important factor is that all of these states fall under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, whose unique doctrine effectively prohibits most enforcement of local public camping bans. This means that it is being done.

Although it began with good intentions to prevent the “criminalization” of poverty and encourage cities to provide shelter, the Ninth Circuit’s approach proved counterproductive. Without credible threats of sanctions against public camps, government authorities have little power to induce people to go to evacuation beds when they are available. Arguably, this undermines the quality of life not only for those who live or work near dangerous camps, but also for homeless people themselves.

That’s why a broad bipartisan coalition, including leaders of big blue cities and small red towns like the Ninth Circuit, is asking the Supreme Court to rule in favor of Grants Pass, Oregon, a small city in the southern part of the state. . Civil penalties for public camping were struck down by the 9th Circuit last year. Oral arguments are on Monday, and we expect the justices to side with Grants Pass.

The Ninth Circuit’s position is that cities can penalize public camping only if there are enough beds in appropriate shelters within city limits to house all the “involuntary” homeless. , that is. To do otherwise would be a violation of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and subject to cruel and unusual punishment. As good as this may sound in theory, in practice the Ninth Circuit and its constituent district courts have defined the conditions for acceptable shelter so narrowly and confusingly that the There are very few places where you can do that.

Federal judges should not be in the business of issuing injunctions while assessing the quantity and quality of shelter. Phoenix, in a court brief for Friends of Grants Pass, said the judge was not “applying clear rules of law” but was acting “as a guide to homelessness policy.” Stated. Compounding the problem is the fact that shelters run by church groups may not count as available space, as faith-based environments can create the potential for unconstitutional religious establishments. This is the opinion of the 9th Circuit. Grants Pass violated this notable requirement because 138 of its beds were at Gospel Rescue Mission.

Read an overview of Oregon towns. And its supporters on the Supreme Court will be surprised by the gap between the Ninth Circuit’s vision and the real-world damage that results from federal court oversight of this traditional local responsibility. In Grants Pass, people camping along the Rogue River use the river for bathing, toileting, and drinking water. Last May, a homeless man killed another man in a park. The bigger the city, the bigger the problems. In San Francisco, more than 800 fires were started in 2023 by people cooking and staying warm in homeless encampments. Disease spread, along with dangerous waste such as discarded syringes and needles.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D) brief acknowledged that sleeping outside should not be punished when there is truly no alternative, but the 9th Circuit ruled that local officials should not be punished for sleeping outside when there is truly no alternative. Not only are they at risk of litigation if they take action, but they are also liable for the consequences of their inaction.” He also cited the contradictory fact that while homeless encampments in McPherson Square can be removed, communities in the state cannot.

The framers of the Eighth Amendment, who based it on the British Declaration of Rights, were responding to the barbarism of James II. The original purpose was to prevent punishments such as branding, burning at the stake, public dissection, and drawing and quartering. The Supreme Court updated this in 1958, recognizing “evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a mature society.”

However, throughout history, courts have generally distinguished between society’s power to impose consequences for wrongful acts (regulated by the Eighth Amendment) and society’s power to define wrongful acts (which society is not). I’ve been doing it. In this case, the Ninth Circuit blurred that basic distinction. Fortunately, the Supreme Court can help restore order to both the Constitution and parks, roads, and sidewalks across the West.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
prosperplanetpulse.com
  • Website

Related Posts

Opinion

The rule of law is more important than feelings about Trump | Opinion

July 15, 2024
Opinion

OPINION | Biden needs to follow through on promise to help Tulsa victims

July 15, 2024
Opinion

Opinion | Why China is off-limits to me now

July 15, 2024
Opinion

Opinion | Fast food chains’ value menu wars benefit consumers

July 15, 2024
Opinion

Uncovering the truth about IVF myths | Opinion

July 15, 2024
Opinion

Opinion: America’s definition of “refugee” needs updating

July 15, 2024
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Subscribe to News

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

Editor's Picks

The rule of law is more important than feelings about Trump | Opinion

July 15, 2024

OPINION | Biden needs to follow through on promise to help Tulsa victims

July 15, 2024

Opinion | Why China is off-limits to me now

July 15, 2024

Opinion | Fast food chains’ value menu wars benefit consumers

July 15, 2024
Latest Posts

ATLANTIC-ACM Announces 2024 U.S. Business Connectivity Service Provider Excellence Awards

July 10, 2024

Costco’s hourly workers will get a pay raise. Read the CEO memo.

July 10, 2024

Why a Rockland restaurant closed after 48 years

July 10, 2024

Stay Connected

Twitter Linkedin-in Instagram Facebook-f Youtube

Subscribe