I would like to take this opportunity to highlight some recent examples. I pointed out to journalists that many residents, MPs and local media are still very vocal, regularly giving differing opinions and asking questions about government policies they think should be addressed.
04:19
Hong Kong passes domestic national security law, expedited bill shelved for 20 years
Hong Kong passes domestic national security law, expedited bill shelved for 20 years
It will take a long time for a city’s waste management program to become successful once it is implemented. It can take up to a decade to change people’s habits, adjust their lifestyles, adapt processes and develop optimal infrastructure.
The results of the trial are expected to be known by May or June. These should highlight the key challenges that all residents must overcome at the start of planning and provide clear direction.
Hong Kong’s waste charge: Remember, the proof of the pudding is in the eating
Hong Kong’s waste charge: Remember, the proof of the pudding is in the eating
This is a great example of people across Hong Kong debating and actively expressing opinions that are inconsistent with the government’s position. While I do not support further delays, I understand that many local residents have concerns about the difficulty of adapting to a new system of waste management.
In this case, the investor’s decision to delay the opening of a high-profile family office raised questions about his background, commitment to Hong Kong, and ability to make investment decisions. The result was critical media coverage and embarrassment to government officials.
These are just a few examples of people expressing their opinions publicly, and there are many more. Therefore, the suggestion that people are afraid to express their opinions about the Hong Kong government on local issues is inaccurate.
But an anonymous survey conducted by the Foreign Correspondents’ Association last year found that 88% of correspondents and journalists reported a decreased willingness to be quoted or discuss sensitive topics.
There is no denying that there is a level of self-censorship, with some people preferring to avoid certain subjects or public comments for fear of embarrassing the government or upsetting the status quo. Some people may avoid the spotlight and fear judgment from their peers, but this is natural and a personal choice.
Nevertheless, this does not mean that the new national security law will prevent people from speaking out on issues related to Hong Kong.
I remain committed to sharing my perspectives and insights and providing constructive feedback to community members, national and international journalists, and governments. We strongly believe that if you have Hong Kong’s best interests at heart, you can openly discuss issues without fear of reprisal.
Bernard Chan is a Hong Kong businessman and former Chairman of the Executive Council
