Close Menu
  • Home
  • Business News
    • Entrepreneurship
  • Investments
  • Markets
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Startups
    • Stock Market
  • Trending
    • Technology
  • Online Jobs

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

What's Hot

Tech Entrepreneurship: Eliminating waste and eliminating scarcity

July 17, 2024

AI for Entrepreneurs and Small Business Owners

July 17, 2024

Young Entrepreneurs Succeed in Timor-Leste Business Plan Competition

July 17, 2024
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • Business News
    • Entrepreneurship
  • Investments
  • Markets
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Startups
    • Stock Market
  • Trending
    • Technology
  • Online Jobs
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
Prosper planet pulse
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • About us
    • Advertise with Us
  • AFFILIATE DISCLOSURE
  • Contact
  • DMCA Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Terms of Use
  • Shop
Prosper planet pulse
Home»Opinion»OPINION | Conversations and insights about the current situation.
Opinion

OPINION | Conversations and insights about the current situation.

prosperplanetpulse.comBy prosperplanetpulse.comMay 29, 2024No Comments3 Mins Read0 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Jonathan Alter

May 28, 2024 3:18 PM

May 28, 2024 3:18 PM

Todd Blanche and Donald Trump.credit…Josh Cochran

If Donald Trump is soon to be found a felon, he and his defense team can partly blame themselves: They presented implausible arguments against the prosecution’s case throughout the trial, and on Tuesday, Trump’s lead lawyer, Todd Blanche, sneaked in an IED at the end of closing arguments that exploded in Trump’s face.

“You can’t send someone to jail based on what Michael Cohen says,” Blanche said, trying to portray it as up to the jury to decide whether the president should be jailed.

“It’s outrageous to say that,” Judge Juan Merchan told Blanche after the jury retired for lunch. Mentioning the sentence to gain sympathy from jurors who have no say in the punishment is “totally unacceptable,” the judge said, adding, “I find it hard to imagine that that was unintentional.”

The defense got more than a rebuke. After lunch, Marchand explained to the jury why they had to ignore the vile act. Not a good final impression for the defense.

During his three-hour closing argument, Blanche gave jurors some leeway in exploring reasonable doubt but for the most part he pivoted sharply, setting up the prosecution to present a better argument in the afternoon.

My favorite goofy moment was, “Who else do you think we didn’t hear from in this trial?” Blanche asked. “Don and Eric. Is there any suspicion that they were involved in the conspiracy?” No, the lawyers. But jurors will likely wonder why the defense called Trump’s own sons instead of Robert Costello, who broke under cross-examination.

Mr. Blanche raved about trying to discredit two “smoking guns” presented by the prosecution. The first was a memo scribbled by former Trump Organization financial chief Allen Weisselberg detailing the $420,000 that Mr. Trump paid to Mr. Cohen in 2017. Mr. Weisselberg wrote “grossed up,” meaning the $130,000 in hush money was doubled for tax purposes. “That’s a lie,” Mr. Blanche said, undermining the word by using it more than 30 times in closing arguments.

But it wasn’t a lie: A former Trump Organization executive admitted on the stand that the numbers and “grossing up” were Weisberg’s own doing.

Another smoking gun was the phone call recorded by Cohen, in which Trump said “150” about the hush money to Karen McDougal. Blanche tried, unsuccessfully in my opinion, to prove that Cohen’s phone call was doctored, by playing the tape and disputing the idea that Trump saying “150” had anything to do with Trump saying “cash” on the tape and the hush money. The jury will likely hear the tape and decide for themselves. Trust me, you should hear “150.”

Blanche ended her closing argument by telling the jurors that if they looked at the evidence, “an acquittal would be very easy and quick.” Insulting the intelligence of the jurors? Not wise.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
prosperplanetpulse.com
  • Website

Related Posts

Opinion

The rule of law is more important than feelings about Trump | Opinion

July 15, 2024
Opinion

OPINION | Biden needs to follow through on promise to help Tulsa victims

July 15, 2024
Opinion

Opinion | Why China is off-limits to me now

July 15, 2024
Opinion

Opinion | Fast food chains’ value menu wars benefit consumers

July 15, 2024
Opinion

Uncovering the truth about IVF myths | Opinion

July 15, 2024
Opinion

Opinion: America’s definition of “refugee” needs updating

July 15, 2024
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Subscribe to News

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

Editor's Picks

The rule of law is more important than feelings about Trump | Opinion

July 15, 2024

OPINION | Biden needs to follow through on promise to help Tulsa victims

July 15, 2024

Opinion | Why China is off-limits to me now

July 15, 2024

Opinion | Fast food chains’ value menu wars benefit consumers

July 15, 2024
Latest Posts

ATLANTIC-ACM Announces 2024 U.S. Business Connectivity Service Provider Excellence Awards

July 10, 2024

Costco’s hourly workers will get a pay raise. Read the CEO memo.

July 10, 2024

Why a Rockland restaurant closed after 48 years

July 10, 2024

Stay Connected

Twitter Linkedin-in Instagram Facebook-f Youtube

Subscribe