Close Menu
  • Home
  • Business News
    • Entrepreneurship
  • Investments
  • Markets
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Startups
    • Stock Market
  • Trending
    • Technology
  • Online Jobs

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

What's Hot

Tech Entrepreneurship: Eliminating waste and eliminating scarcity

July 17, 2024

AI for Entrepreneurs and Small Business Owners

July 17, 2024

Young Entrepreneurs Succeed in Timor-Leste Business Plan Competition

July 17, 2024
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • Business News
    • Entrepreneurship
  • Investments
  • Markets
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Startups
    • Stock Market
  • Trending
    • Technology
  • Online Jobs
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
Prosper planet pulse
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • About us
    • Advertise with Us
  • AFFILIATE DISCLOSURE
  • Contact
  • DMCA Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Terms of Use
  • Shop
Prosper planet pulse
Home»Opinion»Social media apps don’t need warning labels
Opinion

Social media apps don’t need warning labels

prosperplanetpulse.comBy prosperplanetpulse.comJune 20, 2024No Comments4 Mins Read0 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


This week, U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy called on Congress to require warning labels on social media apps. The labels would be similar to cigarette labels that warn about lung cancer and other health concerns. But as someone who has studied the effects of social media for more than a decade, I worry that this call will probably do more harm than good.

There is a lack of evidence to support warning labels. Murthy acknowledges that there is no causal evidence for the harms of social media. That’s true. A recent meta-analysis of experimental studies found little evidence that reducing social media time improves mental health. But Murthy argues that there is strong evidence of correlations of adverse effects. But this is wrong. A recent meta-analysis has revealed that the correlations between social media use and mental health or attention are weak at best and probably statistical noise, or “shit.” Moreover, contrary to popular belief, social media time does not reduce real sociality. Last year, the National Academy of Sciences released a report highlighting that the evidence for harm is weak and inconclusive. Indeed, scholars are still debating the effects of social media, but at this point there is no reassuring evidence to support the Surgeon General’s call.

In the absence of hard evidence linking social media use to adverse outcomes, the warning label requirement is unlikely to survive court scrutiny. The First Amendment does not allow the government to require private entities to broadcast government messages, in this case with warning labels. In extreme cases, where the evidence of harm is clear, such as in the case of tobacco, an exception may be made.

This issue came up 14 years ago when the government tried to restrict the sale of action video games to minors, claiming that video games were the cause of school shootings. The burden was on the government to prove a compelling government interest in restricting minors’ free speech. The Supreme Court ultimately rejected these efforts because there was no evidence to support a link between games and mass murders. If Congress enacts the law the Surgeon General seeks, it would be a waste of the public’s time and money to repeat the same exercise in court. There is simply no research to back up this effort in the inevitable legal battles.

Moreover, warning labels are almost certain to attract young people to social media rather than help them avoid it. “Explicit Lyrics” stickers on music are the product of a moral panic against rock music in the 1980s, but they have only succeeded in increasing explicit lyrics in music, as the stickers themselves attract youth sales.

Even if social media turns out to be largely safe, people may rightly wonder what harm the label could do. Like all moral panics, indulging in panic about social media distracts society’s attention from the real concerns facing young people. The mental health crisis in the United States is not specific to teenagers. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the suicide rate among middle-aged adults is higher than among teenagers. Focusing on teenagers and trying to blame their problems on technology misses the fact that this is a family crisis. In fact, analysis shows that many young people’s mental health problems are caused by parental problems. Young people often react to family stress, the death of a parent by suicide or drug overdose, or physical or mental abuse of the teenager by a parent. Unfortunately, policymakers have been slow to recognize this and have stuck to blaming technology.

Unfortunately, the Surgeon General has historically been a driver of moral panic. In the 1980s, the Surgeon General famously warned that games like Pac-Man and Asteroids were a pressing social problem. The Surgeon General was proven wrong then and is now. The good news is that according to the CDC, youth suicide rates in 2022 went down without government intervention. In contrast, adult suicide rates went up. If we really want to understand young people’s mental health, we need to start focusing on what’s happening to their parents. In the meantime, let’s hope that the decline in youth suicide rates in 2022 becomes a long-term pattern.

Chris Ferguson is a professor of psychology at Stetson University in Florida and author of Madness, How People Make Bad Situations Worse and Catastrophe!





Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
prosperplanetpulse.com
  • Website

Related Posts

Opinion

The rule of law is more important than feelings about Trump | Opinion

July 15, 2024
Opinion

OPINION | Biden needs to follow through on promise to help Tulsa victims

July 15, 2024
Opinion

Opinion | Why China is off-limits to me now

July 15, 2024
Opinion

Opinion | Fast food chains’ value menu wars benefit consumers

July 15, 2024
Opinion

Uncovering the truth about IVF myths | Opinion

July 15, 2024
Opinion

Opinion: America’s definition of “refugee” needs updating

July 15, 2024
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Subscribe to News

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

Editor's Picks

The rule of law is more important than feelings about Trump | Opinion

July 15, 2024

OPINION | Biden needs to follow through on promise to help Tulsa victims

July 15, 2024

Opinion | Why China is off-limits to me now

July 15, 2024

Opinion | Fast food chains’ value menu wars benefit consumers

July 15, 2024
Latest Posts

ATLANTIC-ACM Announces 2024 U.S. Business Connectivity Service Provider Excellence Awards

July 10, 2024

Costco’s hourly workers will get a pay raise. Read the CEO memo.

July 10, 2024

Why a Rockland restaurant closed after 48 years

July 10, 2024

Stay Connected

Twitter Linkedin-in Instagram Facebook-f Youtube

Subscribe