Close Menu
  • Home
  • Business News
    • Entrepreneurship
  • Investments
  • Markets
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Startups
    • Stock Market
  • Trending
    • Technology
  • Online Jobs

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

What's Hot

Tech Entrepreneurship: Eliminating waste and eliminating scarcity

July 17, 2024

AI for Entrepreneurs and Small Business Owners

July 17, 2024

Young Entrepreneurs Succeed in Timor-Leste Business Plan Competition

July 17, 2024
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • Business News
    • Entrepreneurship
  • Investments
  • Markets
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Startups
    • Stock Market
  • Trending
    • Technology
  • Online Jobs
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
Prosper planet pulse
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • About us
    • Advertise with Us
  • AFFILIATE DISCLOSURE
  • Contact
  • DMCA Policy
  • Our Authors
  • Terms of Use
  • Shop
Prosper planet pulse
Home»Politics»Biden claims executive privilege over Garland audio files ahead of House contempt suit against Garland
Politics

Biden claims executive privilege over Garland audio files ahead of House contempt suit against Garland

prosperplanetpulse.comBy prosperplanetpulse.comMay 16, 2024No Comments4 Mins Read0 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Special Counsel Robert Hur testified before the House Judiciary Committee earlier this year.



CNN
—

President Joe Biden claimed executive privilege over a recording of his meeting with special counsel Robert Hur, according to a letter from the White House and Justice Department to House Republicans.

Republican lawmakers had previously subpoenaed audio recordings of Mr. Biden’s interviews, as well as ghostwriter Mark Zwonitzer and other materials obtained from Mr. Xu’s investigation into Mr. Biden’s handling of classified information. The House Oversight and Judiciary Committees will begin proceedings Thursday to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress for failing to respond to those subpoenas.

“Due to the President’s long-standing commitment to protecting the integrity, effectiveness, and independence of Department of Justice and law enforcement investigations, the President has decided to assert executive privilege over the recordings,” White House Counsel Edward Mr. Siskel sent a letter to House Oversight Committee Chairman James. Comer and House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan.

The White House noted that the Justice Department has already provided records of the special counsel’s interviews with Biden and his ghostwriter, and has complied with other aspects of the original subpoena from the Republicans.

Mr. Siskel accused Republicans of trying to distort the recordings and criticized them for pursuing prosecutors with whom they disagree.

“The lack of a legitimate need for audio recordings exposes the likely goal of mutilating, distorting, and using audio recordings for partisan political purposes,” Siskel wrote.

Given the White House’s claim of executive privilege, the Justice Department asked House Republicans to halt a planned contempt lawsuit.

“Given the information we now have, the committee should not proceed with contempt and should avoid unnecessary and unwarranted conflict,” said Assistant Attorney General Carlos Uriarte of the Office of Legislative Affairs. Ta.

Uriarte also defended the need to protect the audio tapes, saying, “We believe that the release of subpoena audio recordings will harm future law enforcement efforts and that the Commission’s continued requests are “We have repeatedly made it clear that this raises serious concerns about separation.”

Transcripts of two days of meetings between Mr. Hsu’s team and Mr. Biden were released in March ahead of Mr. Hsu’s testimony before the House Judiciary Committee.

Mr. Xu did not recommend charges against Mr. Biden in his report, and said in an interview that the president came across as a “sympathetic, well-meaning, older man with a poor memory.”

CNN filed a lawsuit in April seeking access to a recording of Biden’s interview.

House Republicans have argued through subpoenas to the Justice Department that the audio recordings are critical to Biden’s impeachment inquiry, but the investigation remains stalled as the prospects of the probe leading to impeachment become increasingly slim. Without a narrow majority vote and no evidence of impeachable crimes, Republicans are now struggling with how to conclude the investigation and are considering ways to target other members of the Biden administration. I’m looking for something.

Republicans said in their contempt report that the Justice Department cannot determine what information would be helpful in the investigation, and that the nuances of language in the audio recordings are unique to the subject matter not reflected in the recordings. claimed to provide insight.

“The Constitution does not permit the executive branch to instruct Congress on how to conduct or monitor impeachment investigations,” the report states.

Meanwhile, the Republican Party said in its report that while interview transcripts reflect what was said, they do not “reflect important linguistic context, such as tone and tone, or nonverbal context, such as pause and pace of speech. ” he claims.

Republicans argue that such pauses and intonations “may indicate a witness’s ability to recall events or whether the person is intentionally giving evasive or unresponsive testimony to investigators.” ” he claims.

Republicans point to a recent example of a discrepancy between the president’s transcript and audio recording, including a speech last month in which Biden read teleprompter cues out loud during a speech that were not reflected in the recording of the event. However, he said that it was not reflected in his speech. First transcript of his remarks.

The House Oversight Committee has delayed the start of Thursday’s raise to allow Republican members to attend former President Donald Trump’s criminal trial in New York City, two sources familiar with the plan told CNN. .

Asked for comment on the reason for the schedule change, a spokesperson for the oversight board told CNN: “Due to conflicts with members’ schedules, markup will begin at a different time to accommodate members’ schedules. It became,” he said.

This article and heading have been updated with additional developments.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
prosperplanetpulse.com
  • Website

Related Posts

Politics

Biden, Democrats, Republicans condemn shooting at Trump rally

July 14, 2024
Politics

President Trump safe in shooting under investigation as assassination attempt

July 14, 2024
Politics

Trump injured in shooting at Pennsylvania rally

July 14, 2024
Politics

New York politicians react to possible shooting – NBC New York

July 14, 2024
Politics

Melania Trump not planning to speak at Republican Convention

July 14, 2024
Politics

Trump rushes off stage after shooting at Pennsylvania rally

July 13, 2024
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Subscribe to News

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

Editor's Picks

The rule of law is more important than feelings about Trump | Opinion

July 15, 2024

OPINION | Biden needs to follow through on promise to help Tulsa victims

July 15, 2024

Opinion | Why China is off-limits to me now

July 15, 2024

Opinion | Fast food chains’ value menu wars benefit consumers

July 15, 2024
Latest Posts

ATLANTIC-ACM Announces 2024 U.S. Business Connectivity Service Provider Excellence Awards

July 10, 2024

Costco’s hourly workers will get a pay raise. Read the CEO memo.

July 10, 2024

Why a Rockland restaurant closed after 48 years

July 10, 2024

Stay Connected

Twitter Linkedin-in Instagram Facebook-f Youtube

Subscribe